Posts

Showing posts from March, 2021

Final Thoughts on 1984 (How to Avoid a Similar Fate)

 Compared to the time that Orwell wrote 1984 , we are a lot closer to the bleak future he wrote out to be the reality. At least this is true in terms of technology and invasion of privacy. The only thing that I believe we can do as a society to avoid this future is to keep solid checks and balances of governmental power, and as citizens, hold the government accountable for their actions. At the moment, we as citizens still hold the principles that individual privacy should be expected and respected. We also have in place checks and balances within the government so one branch doesn’t take over. I don’t think we can do anything about the development of surveillance technology because technology will inevitably improve and become more advanced. But by keeping the expectation that we deserve privacy to some level, and not budging on that stance, I think simply the sheer amount of people who still want their freedom with keep the government from invading privacy any more than they alre...

Newspeak

 As we end 1984 , we come across a unique section at the conclusion of the book talking about the vocabulary of the society in 1984 : Newspeak. This language is very interesting, being split into different categories for vocabulary pertaining to certain subjects. We have vocabulary A for basic words and sayings, vocabulary B for words pertaining to politics or the Party, and vocabulary C for science and technology (but there aren't any specific words for this section, just broad and general terms). Newspeak is also limited compared to the current English language, leaving no room for interpretation, misunderstanding, and so on. Newspeak is also quite unique and differs greatly from "old" English, which is quite genius from the perspective of a controlling society. With all these new words which are fewer in quantity, it is considerably harder for older documents to be interpreted into Newspeak. This can easily allow for the Party to manipulate whatever texts they please w...

What is "right"?

This section of 1984 clearly showcases the foolishness of Winston to believe he could ever make it out the other end of the Party’s torture with some semblance of the person he was before. Throughout his time being punished by the Party we see him slowly sacrificing parts of his beliefs, starting with the simple fact that 2+2=5. In the end the torture is so much that he makes the effort to make himself genuinely believe in the Party and its morals: “god is power” “freedom is slavery” etc.  Although it is interesting to see in a novel, I think the way Winston changes his beliefs is more telling to society in general. I think it’s very interesting how the human mind can believe anything to be “true” if it tries hard enough. I find this scary in a way because this means one’s perception of the truth can be twisted easily. This is after all how we end up in conflicts, and on a larger scale, wars. Do you think you could make yourself believe something to be "correct" that you didn...

Torture & its Effectiveness

I admire 1984 for showing reality above all. Many other books would have their protagonists succeed in whatever their goal: overthrowing the current system, defying the power holders successfully, etc. However, 1984 shows the bleak but true reality of it all. With the torture that befalls Winston and Julia, we get to see the real impact of physical pain and torture on the human mind. Both Winston and Julia accepted that if they got caught, they would probably confess their actions, but they wouldn’t stop loving each other. However, they are both very naïve to the effects torture can have. Even with the very beginnings of torture, Winston is willing to twist his beliefs , even if its something as simple as how many fingers someone is holding up. At this rate I believe that both Winston and Julia will do a full 180 and be completely brainwashed of their old “rebellious” ways. Do you think the Party’s torture will be successful? To what degree?